Browse Bib Headings
Open Browse Bibliographic Headings
There are two ways to open the bibliographic headings browsing options in the Metadata Editor:
- From the left menu column, select Resources > Cataloging > Browse Bibliographic Headings.
The MDE will pop up with the Browse Bibliographic Headings window in the main pane: - In the MDE, select menu option Search & Browse > Browse Bibliographic Headings. If you already have a bib or holdings record open, the Browse Bibliographic Headings window will appear to the right of the record, in split pane mode:
You can browse by the following heading types:
- Names (the default option)
- Series
- Subject
- Title
- Call Number/Classifications
Note that this tool shows headings that appear in bibliographic records in our catalog. If you are trying to search for authorized headings, use the F3 key to access the authorities lookup.
Interpreting the Headings Browse Results
When you search for a heading in the Browse Bibliographic Headings tool, the resulting list of headings will appear as follows:
- On the left side of the main pane, you see the list of headings. Headings with the binoculars icon to the left are authorized; those without the binoculars icon are uncontrolled headings in our catalog.
- The number next to the binoculars indicates the number of times the heading appears in our catalog.
- Clicking the "view" button will pull up any associated authority or bibliographic records in the right side of the main pane. If the heading is not established, only associated bib records will be displayed.
- Consult the Ex Libris documentation, linked below, for information on which fields and subfields are indexed.
Source
Ex Libris Knowledge Center > Browsing Bibliographic Headings contains extensive documentation on the available search parameters and fields/subfields indexed by the browse feature.
Known Issues
There are a number of known issues with Alma's Browse Bib Headings feature, some of which are slated to be fixed in upcoming software updates:
(Table below adapted from Harvard's Alma Wiki)
General | Problem | Impact | Workaround | Created Date | Expected resolution (Via Harvard) |
Usability issues |
| (Initially reported as part of implementation) Salesforce case created after lack of traction: 11/12/19 (Also reported to UX basecamp) | |||
Headings Info search (via Browse) fails to retrieve data for LC names for 651 when using "Exact phrase starting with" |
| 1/31/20 | |||
Heading Type: Source Code | Problem | Impact | Workaround | Created Date | Expected resolution |
Name | 240 is missing from index entries for 100 / 110 / 111 | Name-title entries are incomplete because they include $t from 6XX/7XX but not 240 with 1XX | 6/21/17 | Working with ExL to develop new, separate name-title browse | |
Name: Personal | $t is missing from entries based on 700. | Name-title values from 700 are listed as only names and not names with titles. Name-title values from 600 are listed as names with titles. Name-title values file separately when they are 700 vs. 600 due to inconsistency of title display | 4/6/18 | Same as above Update Feb 2021: ExL reported this would not be part of current development work plan | |
Name: Personal | $q is missing from entries based on 100/700. Is present for entries based on 600. | Names with qualifiers from 100/700 are listed as only names without qualifiers Names with qualifiers from 600 are listed as names with qualifiers. Names with qualifiers file separately when they are 100/700 vs. 600 due to inconsistency of qualifier display | 4/6/18 | Planned to be fixed August 2021 | |
Series: Uniform Title | 490/1 is included | 490/1 is not a controlled heading, therefore the list cannot be used to verify whether the series headings in controlled fields have the correct term | 12/18/2018 | Case closed. Needs to be enhancement or Ideas Exchange. Forwarded to ELUNA Authority Task Group. | |
Title | 240 uniform title is missing 740 title is missing 600 $t is missing | 4/9/18 | Working with ExL to develop new, separate name-title browse Update Feb 2021: ExL reported this would not be part of current development work plan |